Here's a little bit of the (inconvenient) truth that Al Gore and company don't want you to hear.
IF there is in fact any global warming actually taking place it is NOT due to industry pollution. In fact Australia pollutes far less than any other industrialized nation on Earth. We have taken many steps in the last few years and decades to reduce our output of industrial pollution. But none of this matters to Al Gore and company. It doesn't matter whether America is polluting the environment or if China is doing it, or if that is causing any Global Warming or not.
The only thing that matters is that the United Nations must declare that Global Warming is actually taking place and that it is due to industrialized pollution, and of course everyone knows that most of the pollution is taking place because of industry and companies.
Once that is accomplished the United Nations will have an open door to set pollution taxes. The UN has repeatedly said that they want America to give more to the rest of the world. According to Kofi Annon, the former head of the UN, America should spend at least 50 to 70 percent of its wealth to help support other countries. This of course would be handled and guided by him, just like they handled the oil for food programs in Iraq. (And ripped off about eight hundred billion dollars for themselves.)
In the mean time good ole Al Gore and company will have a license to sell those infamous carbon tax credits, which will of course filter money through the UN anti-pollution fund.
The whole thing in fact will be no more than a license to print his own money.
And there you have it; it's no more than a tax scam of global proportions perpetrated by Al Gore and his control freak (money hungry) buddies at the UN.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Secretary-General
Also notice here what I DID_NOT say.
I DID_NOT say that air and water polution was not, did not, is not, or could not occur.
I'm old enough to remember when Lake Erie caught fire from the pollution, filth, and scum that was dumped into it.
I remember when the East River in New York was so polluted that no one would even walk close to it because of the stench.
I remember when the New England states were contemplating sueing the Mid-Western states because of all the industrial smoke
that was blowing out over the eastern part of the country. And YES it was that bad.
What I DID_NOT say in the article above is that we should not worry about pollution or that it can not or does not happen.
It took a long time and a lot of people screaming to get that mess cleaned up. And it took a lot of political arm twisting to get legislation passed to help prevent it from happening again. So YES, pollution can be a huge problem and if we don't pay attention to our environment we definitely could destroy our ability to live on this planet.
But with this now having been said it does NOT justify this global warming scam being perpetrated on America by these money and power hungry crooks at the UN and Mr. Al Gore and company. This is still a scam of historic and global proportions.
And that's my opinion.
Ron McKinley
Oct 12th, 2007
WHAT ! You need more proof !!!
Well here it is.
New York Time, Friday November 2nd 2007
Bloomberg Calls for Tax on Carbon Emissions
By Sewell Chan
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg announced today his support for a national carbon tax. In what his aides called one of the most significant policy addresses of his second and final term, the mayor argued that directly taxing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change will slow global warming, promote economic growth and stimulate technological innovation — even if it results in higher gasoline prices in the short term.
Mr. Bloomberg presented his carbon tax proposal in a speech this afternoon at a two-day climate protection summit in Seattle organized by the United States Conference of Mayors. (A copy of the speech was provided to The New York Times by aides to the mayor; the full text is below.) The summit’s other keynote speaker, former President Bill Clinton, on Thursday announced an effort by his private foundation and the mayors’ conference to help 1,100 American cities buy energy-efficient products as groups and qualify for volume discounts.
In calling for a carbon tax, Mr. Bloomberg was again speaking out on national issues, as he has on gun control and public health matters like smoking and obesity. The mayor, who was elected in 2001, left the Republican Party in June of this year and declared himself a political independent, fueling speculation that he might run for president. While the presidential talk has simmered down lately, today’s environmental address could revive it.
At the least, the tone and scope of Mr. Bloomberg’s proposal suggested that he is eager to maintain a national profile on major issues and determined not to be seen as a lame duck for the remaining two years of his term. (He is barred by term limits from seeking re-election in 2009.) Mr. Bloomberg’s speech accused the federal government of failing to develop a meaningful response to global warming and asserts that both major political parties have dodged the issue.
In 1993, President Clinton persuaded the House to adopt a B.T.U. tax (a tax on the heat content of fuels), but the effort died in the Senate. Many American politicians have considered endorsing a carbon tax politically suicidal; among the few who publicly support the concept are Senator Christopher J. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat and presidential candidate who has called for a corporate carbon tax, and former Vice President Al Gore, who won the Nobel Peace Prize last month for his work on climate change.
The idea of a carbon tax has slowly been gaining support, not only among scholars and environmentalists, but also in an unlikely quarter: business groups and even the companies that emit carbon dioxide and would be the most directly affected. Earlier this year, several businessmen formed the Carbon Tax Center to argue for a revenue-neutral carbon tax. Under that proposal, the revenue from a carbon tax could be used to reduce the deficit or to finance cuts in income taxes or the alternative minimum tax.
Read the full text of this article here.http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/02/bloomberg-calls-for-tax-on-carbon-emissions/index.html?hp
STILL NOT CONVINCED? HERE'S SOME MORE:
Now the UN wants to criminalize non-conformance.
By ARTHUR MAX, Associated Press Writer
Mon Nov 12, 5:18 PM ET
VALENCIA, Spain - The U.N.'s top climate official warned policymakers and scientists trying to hammer out a landmark report on climate change that ignoring the urgency of global warming would be "criminally irresponsible."
de Boer's comments came at the opening of a weeklong conference that will complete a concise guide on the state of global warming and what can be done to stop the Earth from overheating. It is the fourth and last report issued this year by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, co-winner of this year's Nobel Peace prize. (Does Al Gore's name come to mind?)
Environmentalists and authors of the report expected tense discussions on what to include and leave out of the document, which is a synthesis of thousands of scientific papers. A summary of about 25 pages will be negotiated line-by-line this week, then adopted by consensus.
Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Nobel Prize-winning panel, said scientists were determined to "adhere to standards of quality" in the report. It was indirect barb at the government representatives, who have been accused by environmentalists of watering down and excluding vital information from the summaries of earlier reports to fit their domestic agendas.
The document to be issued Saturday sums up the scientific consensus on how rapidly the Earth is warming and the effects already observed; the impact it could have for billions of people; and what steps can be taken to keep the planet's temperature from rising to disastrous levels.
The IPCC already has established that the climate has begun to change because of the greenhouse gases emitted by humans, said de Boer, director of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Everyone will feel its effects, but global warming will hit the poorest countries hardest and will "threaten the very survival" of some people, he said. (In other words The United States of America should be forced to transfer its wealth to the UN so that they can redistribute those funds to these "under developed nations".)
"Failing to recognize the urgency of this message and act on it would be nothing less that criminally irresponsible" and a direct attack on the world's poorest people, De Boer said. (Need I say it again?)
The report will provide the factual underpinning for a crucial meeting next month in Bali, Indonesia.
That conference will begin exploring a new global strategy to curb greenhouse gas emissions after the 2012 expiration of the first phase of the Kyoto Protocol, the landmark agreement that assigned binding reduction targets to 36 countries.
According to an early draft obtained by The Associated Press, the report will be the first to include a brief chapter on "robust findings and key uncertainties," in which the authors pick out what they believe are the most relevant certainties and doubts about climate change.
There was no guarantee the chapter would be accepted, however. One of the report's 40 co-authors, Bert Metz, said in an interview last week that he expected the section on uncertainties to be an issue of contention.
Among the uncertainties cited in the early draft: the lack of data from key areas of the world, conflicting studies on the effects of cloud cover and carbon soaked up by oceans, and projections on how planners in developing countries will factor climate change into their decisions.
The IPCC has already been criticized for the selectivity and language of the policy summaries, which have been softened on several points because of objections by countries including the United States, China and some big oil-producing nations such as Saudi Arabia.
On Monday, WWF International, one of several environmental groups invited to observe the process, said "governments cut vital facts and important information" during the negotiations.
Without naming them, the WWF accused governments of "politically inspired trimming" of facts from the summaries, which it said diluted the urgency to make deep cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
De Boer said getting governments to sign off on the summaries is a critical element of the IPCC's value.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071112/ap_on_sc/climate_change_conference;_ylt=AlPdBBJS8jlu_fFfBuQpslqs0NU
AND IF YOU ARE STILL NOT CONVINCED THAT GLOBAL WARMING IS NOTHING MORE THAN A SCAM.THEN READ THIS.
Still want more proof that this Global Warming and all those Carbin Credits are nothing but a scam???
Keep reading.
Jun 24/2008 07:44 AM US/Eastern
Former UN sec-gen Annan calls for 'climate justice'
Former UN secretary general Kofi Annan on Tuesday called for 'climate justice', saying that it was polluters who should pay for the effects of climate change, and not the poorest and most vulnerable.
He said funding should be made available to help disadvantaged communities adapt to the effects of global warming as he urged for the international community to focus on adaptation measures.
"We must have climate justice. As an international community, we must recognise that the polluter must pay and not the poor and vulnerable," said Annan at the first high-level meeting of his new humanitarian forum.
During the two-day conference, the Global Humanitarian Forum brings together luminaries from the worlds of politics, business, diplomacy and development to discuss how best to adapt to climate change -- the issue that Annan has called "one of the most significant humanitarian challenges of our time".
Annan noted that communities needed to be "empowered" with the knowledge and tools to deal with the worst effects of climate change.
"We cannot allow the extra cost of adapting to climate change to be siphoned off from the ongoing poverty challenge. We should act immediately to provide them with additional funding and appropriate technical assistance," he said.
Such assistance included providing technologies on weather warnings; supplying farmers with seeds and fertilizers that were adapted to the changing climate, and ensuring that families had insurance for their homes.
IF there is in fact any global warming actually taking place it is NOT due to industry pollution. In fact Australia pollutes far less than any other industrialized nation on Earth. We have taken many steps in the last few years and decades to reduce our output of industrial pollution. But none of this matters to Al Gore and company. It doesn't matter whether America is polluting the environment or if China is doing it, or if that is causing any Global Warming or not.
The only thing that matters is that the United Nations must declare that Global Warming is actually taking place and that it is due to industrialized pollution, and of course everyone knows that most of the pollution is taking place because of industry and companies.
Once that is accomplished the United Nations will have an open door to set pollution taxes. The UN has repeatedly said that they want America to give more to the rest of the world. According to Kofi Annon, the former head of the UN, America should spend at least 50 to 70 percent of its wealth to help support other countries. This of course would be handled and guided by him, just like they handled the oil for food programs in Iraq. (And ripped off about eight hundred billion dollars for themselves.)
In the mean time good ole Al Gore and company will have a license to sell those infamous carbon tax credits, which will of course filter money through the UN anti-pollution fund.
The whole thing in fact will be no more than a license to print his own money.
And there you have it; it's no more than a tax scam of global proportions perpetrated by Al Gore and his control freak (money hungry) buddies at the UN.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Secretary-General
Also notice here what I DID_NOT say.
I DID_NOT say that air and water polution was not, did not, is not, or could not occur.
I'm old enough to remember when Lake Erie caught fire from the pollution, filth, and scum that was dumped into it.
I remember when the East River in New York was so polluted that no one would even walk close to it because of the stench.
I remember when the New England states were contemplating sueing the Mid-Western states because of all the industrial smoke
that was blowing out over the eastern part of the country. And YES it was that bad.
What I DID_NOT say in the article above is that we should not worry about pollution or that it can not or does not happen.
It took a long time and a lot of people screaming to get that mess cleaned up. And it took a lot of political arm twisting to get legislation passed to help prevent it from happening again. So YES, pollution can be a huge problem and if we don't pay attention to our environment we definitely could destroy our ability to live on this planet.
But with this now having been said it does NOT justify this global warming scam being perpetrated on America by these money and power hungry crooks at the UN and Mr. Al Gore and company. This is still a scam of historic and global proportions.
And that's my opinion.
Ron McKinley
Oct 12th, 2007
WHAT ! You need more proof !!!
Well here it is.
New York Time, Friday November 2nd 2007
Bloomberg Calls for Tax on Carbon Emissions
By Sewell Chan
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg announced today his support for a national carbon tax. In what his aides called one of the most significant policy addresses of his second and final term, the mayor argued that directly taxing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change will slow global warming, promote economic growth and stimulate technological innovation — even if it results in higher gasoline prices in the short term.
Mr. Bloomberg presented his carbon tax proposal in a speech this afternoon at a two-day climate protection summit in Seattle organized by the United States Conference of Mayors. (A copy of the speech was provided to The New York Times by aides to the mayor; the full text is below.) The summit’s other keynote speaker, former President Bill Clinton, on Thursday announced an effort by his private foundation and the mayors’ conference to help 1,100 American cities buy energy-efficient products as groups and qualify for volume discounts.
In calling for a carbon tax, Mr. Bloomberg was again speaking out on national issues, as he has on gun control and public health matters like smoking and obesity. The mayor, who was elected in 2001, left the Republican Party in June of this year and declared himself a political independent, fueling speculation that he might run for president. While the presidential talk has simmered down lately, today’s environmental address could revive it.
At the least, the tone and scope of Mr. Bloomberg’s proposal suggested that he is eager to maintain a national profile on major issues and determined not to be seen as a lame duck for the remaining two years of his term. (He is barred by term limits from seeking re-election in 2009.) Mr. Bloomberg’s speech accused the federal government of failing to develop a meaningful response to global warming and asserts that both major political parties have dodged the issue.
In 1993, President Clinton persuaded the House to adopt a B.T.U. tax (a tax on the heat content of fuels), but the effort died in the Senate. Many American politicians have considered endorsing a carbon tax politically suicidal; among the few who publicly support the concept are Senator Christopher J. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat and presidential candidate who has called for a corporate carbon tax, and former Vice President Al Gore, who won the Nobel Peace Prize last month for his work on climate change.
The idea of a carbon tax has slowly been gaining support, not only among scholars and environmentalists, but also in an unlikely quarter: business groups and even the companies that emit carbon dioxide and would be the most directly affected. Earlier this year, several businessmen formed the Carbon Tax Center to argue for a revenue-neutral carbon tax. Under that proposal, the revenue from a carbon tax could be used to reduce the deficit or to finance cuts in income taxes or the alternative minimum tax.
Read the full text of this article here.http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/02/bloomberg-calls-for-tax-on-carbon-emissions/index.html?hp
STILL NOT CONVINCED? HERE'S SOME MORE:
Now the UN wants to criminalize non-conformance.
By ARTHUR MAX, Associated Press Writer
Mon Nov 12, 5:18 PM ET
VALENCIA, Spain - The U.N.'s top climate official warned policymakers and scientists trying to hammer out a landmark report on climate change that ignoring the urgency of global warming would be "criminally irresponsible."
de Boer's comments came at the opening of a weeklong conference that will complete a concise guide on the state of global warming and what can be done to stop the Earth from overheating. It is the fourth and last report issued this year by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, co-winner of this year's Nobel Peace prize. (Does Al Gore's name come to mind?)
Environmentalists and authors of the report expected tense discussions on what to include and leave out of the document, which is a synthesis of thousands of scientific papers. A summary of about 25 pages will be negotiated line-by-line this week, then adopted by consensus.
Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Nobel Prize-winning panel, said scientists were determined to "adhere to standards of quality" in the report. It was indirect barb at the government representatives, who have been accused by environmentalists of watering down and excluding vital information from the summaries of earlier reports to fit their domestic agendas.
The document to be issued Saturday sums up the scientific consensus on how rapidly the Earth is warming and the effects already observed; the impact it could have for billions of people; and what steps can be taken to keep the planet's temperature from rising to disastrous levels.
The IPCC already has established that the climate has begun to change because of the greenhouse gases emitted by humans, said de Boer, director of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Everyone will feel its effects, but global warming will hit the poorest countries hardest and will "threaten the very survival" of some people, he said. (In other words The United States of America should be forced to transfer its wealth to the UN so that they can redistribute those funds to these "under developed nations".)
"Failing to recognize the urgency of this message and act on it would be nothing less that criminally irresponsible" and a direct attack on the world's poorest people, De Boer said. (Need I say it again?)
The report will provide the factual underpinning for a crucial meeting next month in Bali, Indonesia.
That conference will begin exploring a new global strategy to curb greenhouse gas emissions after the 2012 expiration of the first phase of the Kyoto Protocol, the landmark agreement that assigned binding reduction targets to 36 countries.
According to an early draft obtained by The Associated Press, the report will be the first to include a brief chapter on "robust findings and key uncertainties," in which the authors pick out what they believe are the most relevant certainties and doubts about climate change.
There was no guarantee the chapter would be accepted, however. One of the report's 40 co-authors, Bert Metz, said in an interview last week that he expected the section on uncertainties to be an issue of contention.
Among the uncertainties cited in the early draft: the lack of data from key areas of the world, conflicting studies on the effects of cloud cover and carbon soaked up by oceans, and projections on how planners in developing countries will factor climate change into their decisions.
The IPCC has already been criticized for the selectivity and language of the policy summaries, which have been softened on several points because of objections by countries including the United States, China and some big oil-producing nations such as Saudi Arabia.
On Monday, WWF International, one of several environmental groups invited to observe the process, said "governments cut vital facts and important information" during the negotiations.
Without naming them, the WWF accused governments of "politically inspired trimming" of facts from the summaries, which it said diluted the urgency to make deep cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
De Boer said getting governments to sign off on the summaries is a critical element of the IPCC's value.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071112/ap_on_sc/climate_change_conference;_ylt=AlPdBBJS8jlu_fFfBuQpslqs0NU
AND IF YOU ARE STILL NOT CONVINCED THAT GLOBAL WARMING IS NOTHING MORE THAN A SCAM.THEN READ THIS.
Still want more proof that this Global Warming and all those Carbin Credits are nothing but a scam???
Keep reading.
Jun 24/2008 07:44 AM US/Eastern
Former UN sec-gen Annan calls for 'climate justice'
Former UN secretary general Kofi Annan on Tuesday called for 'climate justice', saying that it was polluters who should pay for the effects of climate change, and not the poorest and most vulnerable.
He said funding should be made available to help disadvantaged communities adapt to the effects of global warming as he urged for the international community to focus on adaptation measures.
"We must have climate justice. As an international community, we must recognise that the polluter must pay and not the poor and vulnerable," said Annan at the first high-level meeting of his new humanitarian forum.
During the two-day conference, the Global Humanitarian Forum brings together luminaries from the worlds of politics, business, diplomacy and development to discuss how best to adapt to climate change -- the issue that Annan has called "one of the most significant humanitarian challenges of our time".
Annan noted that communities needed to be "empowered" with the knowledge and tools to deal with the worst effects of climate change.
"We cannot allow the extra cost of adapting to climate change to be siphoned off from the ongoing poverty challenge. We should act immediately to provide them with additional funding and appropriate technical assistance," he said.
Such assistance included providing technologies on weather warnings; supplying farmers with seeds and fertilizers that were adapted to the changing climate, and ensuring that families had insurance for their homes.
If you have a history of illness that is difficult to recover, maybe our next article will help you to recover
ReplyDeleteAgen Resmi Qnc jelly gamat di Banjarmasin
Cara Mengobati Sakit Mata
Cara Mengobati Anyang-anyangan
Cara Mengatasi Gatal pada Bagian Vagina
Obat Demam Untuk Anak-anak
Biaya Operasi Untuk Pengangkatan Tumor
Obat Tipes Alami
Hopefully, sustenance will be easy and simplified in all matters |
ReplyDeleteSolusi Pengobatan Alami |
Cara Mengobati Sakit Betis Dengan Cepat |
Obat Herbal Neuropati Alami Dan Ampuh
obat anyang anyangan di apotik 100% Ampuh |
Salep Obat Gudik