Saturday, June 11, 2011

Scientists Who Support Natural Climate Change


Scientists Who Support Natural Climate Change
Contrary to popular belief, there are actually a lot of scientists who support the theory of natural climate change, as opposed to believing that global warming is wholly the fault of humankind.  Some activists prefer to imply that these scientists are crackpots, but I’ve found that the greater majority of them are highly respected in their fields.  I simply haven’t heard a lot about them, and you probably haven’t either.  The reason for that it simple: they don’t agree with the manipulative agenda that insists the human race is responsible for climate change.
Scientists Who Support Natural Climate Change:
Khabibullo Abdusamatov, who is both an astronomer and a mathematician at the Pulkova Observatory, which is part of the esteemed Russian Academy of Sciences, believes that climate change is natural.  He is on record as stating that he believes global warming has more to do with solar radiation.  In other words, it is caused mainly by the sun.  He further believes that there isn’t sufficient scientific proof that the greenhouse effect affects the Earth’s atmosphere.
Another astronomer, Sallie Baliunas, also makes it clear that climate change is natural.  She works at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, implying strongly that she’s one of our time’s brightest minds.  Again, she clearly states her opinion that greenhouse gases made by humans are not sufficient to cause the warming in climate temperatures.  Most scientists who take this position are actually in agreement about this point.
Similarly, George V. Chilingar, who teaches at the University of Southern California as a professor of Civil and Petroleum Engineering, agrees.  In order, he thinks the climate change is due to solar radiation first, out-gassing second, and microbial activities third.  He doesn’t think there is enough proof to support the theory that the climate is changing because of humans or our activities.  Clearly he is not the only scientist who holds that belief.
William Happer is a physicist who works at Princeton University.  With a specialty in spectroscopy and optics, he knows what he’s talking about when he states a belief that the current climate changes are consistent with warming trends that took place in the past.  This has happened before.  This supports the theory that the Earth periodically and consistently goes through climate changes – and it’s always fine; the world hasn’t ended because of them.
Tad Murty is an oceanographer, and he actually believes that global warming is a hoax.  Not just that, but he believes it’s actually the largest hoax ever put forth from the scientific community.  His belief is that the Earth’s atmosphere hasn’t changed significantly in millions of years.  Further, he believes, again, that the Earth and its atmosphere consistently goes through periods of heating and cooling, and states that during some eras, tomatoes could be grown in the North Pole!
These are just a few of the scientists who support natural climate change.  There are many more, as well as a number of others who simply doubt that the projections of the IPCC, or Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, are entirely accurate.  I had no idea that so many pillars of the scientific and environmental communities felt the way I do about climate change and global warming.  Seeing their beliefs have cemented mine that there is no way global warming can be wholly the fault of humankind, or even primarily our fault.  It is completely natural instead.

2 comments:

  1. Great read Thank you for the facts

    ReplyDelete
  2. The IPCC numbers themselves do not lie.. and if we climate realists (my name for deniers) have read the numbers, how can anyone doubt them. 97% of CO2 caused by nature. 3% by humans. Australians have 1.4% total from that 3%. That is ..0000045% of so-called harmful emissions. How can our so-called PM argue with the basic set of numbers from the IPCC..which Garnaut so rigidly bases his decisions upon? She is an idiot.

    ReplyDelete