Thursday, September 6, 2012

       THE STATE OF OUR BELOVED

                       COUNTRY!

The country was in a terrible state,As the Parliament sat for the Budget Debate. 
It was quite a few minutes before Gillard spoke,Then she said, 
‘Sex will cost you two bucks a poke.Whether you're short or skinny or thick.A tax will be paid on the use of your prick’.

Penny Wong rose and said, ‘Julia look here, What about dildos and those who are queer?

Gr...eenie 
, Bob Brown looked rather glum, 'May I be exempt, I only like bum...
Julia replied and sounded quite airy,'You will pay double, you dirty old fairy’ 

Up rose the Mad Monk, to tremendous applause,
Grabbed Julie Bishop and ripped off her drawers.......He mounted upon her and screwed her at will,Then shouted to Gillard, ‘Put that on the Bill!'
 
Wayne Swan now shouted, ‘I think I’ll resign,I haven’t had sex for a very long time. I dream every night of a big hairy crotch,But two bucks a go? ...that’s too bloody much.

’ The House was in uproar, the fighting went on,Then Turnbull came out with his little dong,‘With a tax on a poke in the front and the back All we can do is have a good whack.’

'I disagree,' said Joyce with a leer,And stuck his big prick into Bob Katter’s ear. 

The backbenchers came and the Cabinet went, Rudd took his out and found it was bent.‘Look here,' he cried as it swung in the air,‘For those who are bent a discount is fair.

’So all checked their dicks, Peter Slipper was last,And in the excitement, the damned Bill was passed! 

So now, in the beds of Australia at night, There’s many a fanny that’s closed up real tight.

 They’re taxing our booze and taxing our smokes,And now the bastards are taxing our pokes.

 If two bucks a head is the price we must pay, It's now with ourselves we find we must play. 

To ease our frustrations we must have a wank;
for the state of our Country...

we’ve Gillard to thank !


Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Sign the petition-Legally Challenge the Carbon Tax Australia

Legally Challenge the Carbon Tax Australia
Published by rachel davies on Apr 10, 2012
Target: Premiers and Attorneys-General of the States with the best legal standing for a potential challenge
Region: Australia
Background (Preamble):
‘The carbon tax is unconstitutional according to a legal opinion from expert, Bryan Pape, commissioned by the Institute of Public Affairs and reported in the Australian Financial Review this morning', said Tim Wilson, Climate Change Policy Director.

‘Mr Pape is one of Australia's most respected administrative lawyers and led a 2009 case that nearly over-turned the Rudd government's stimulus package in the High Court'.

‘The legal opinion concludes that the legislation can be challenged on a number of grounds, including:

1. The Commonwealth cannot tax State property. Legally carbon dioxide emissions are State property.

2. The Commonwealth cannot impose a carbon tax and other related penalties within the same Act.

3. The Commonwealth cannot introduce a carbon tax within its external affairs powers.

‘The IPA commissioned a legal opinion because State governments have sat on their hands and let the Gillard government introduce a tax that they could potentially stop'.

‘There's still a chance State governments could make Julia Gillard an honest politician by stopping a carbon tax under a government she leads'.

‘Only the High Court can decide the Constitutionality of the carbon tax, but there are clear grounds to challenge it according to one of Australia's top administrative law minds'.

‘Pending a possible legal challenge to the tax the full legal opinion is not being released. A copy is being provided to the Premiers and Attorneys-General of the States with the best legal standing for a potential challenge - New South Wales, Queensland and Western Australia'.
Petition:
We, the people of Australia demand our constitutional rights be upheld. As our elected representatives we call upon you to legally challenge the Carbon Tax. This was not mandated by the people and is unconstitutional.


The Legally Challenge the Carbon Tax Australia petition to Premiers and Attorneys-General of the States with the best legal standing for a potential challenge was written by rachel davies and is in the category Politics at GoPetition. Contact author here.

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

"What is truly evil is that Al Gore and his scientific prostitutes take advantage of people’s ignorance." -JD Carson

These sites and articles completely knock the wind out of the enviro's big green sails. Here you will find thousands of scientists declare that human-caused global warming & climate change is a lie with no scientific basis whatsoever, and you will learn that the hypothesis claiming that our CO2 additions can affect climate in any way has failed every relevant experimental test. It lives on only in the dreams of anti-technologists, population reduction advocates, environmental extremists, and large corporations and politicians cashing in on the myth. In addition to these links, click the image on the right to see the latest NIPCC report, Climate Change Reconsidered.

>
OVER 31,000 SCIENTISTS REFUTE MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING ON THIS PETITION

> OVER 4,000 SCIENTISTS REFUTE MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING ON THIS PETITION

> OVER 1,100 CLIMATE EXPERTS REFUTE MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING ON THIS DECLARATION

> OVER 650 SCIENTISTS PUBLICLY DISSENT AGAINST AL GORE AND IPCC POLICIES

> 500 SCIENTISTS REFUTE MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING AT THIS INSTITUTE

> 170 SCIENTISTS, ECONOMISTS, AND THEOLOGIANS SIGN AN OPEN LETTER REFUTING MAN-MADE CLIMATE CHANGE

> 115 SCIENTISTS CORRECT PRESIDENT OBAMA AND DECLARE MAN-MADE CLIMATE CHANGE A MYTH

> 100 SCIENTISTS SIGN AN OPEN LETTER TO THE UNITED NATIONS REFUTING MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING

> 60 SCIENTISTS CALL ON PRIME MINISTER HARPER TO REVISIT SCIENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING

> 47 ATMOSPHERIC SCIENTISTS REFUTE MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING ON THIS STATEMENT

> 41 SCIENTISTS DEBUNK MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING ALERT

Do the math. That's tens of thousands of worldwide scientists finally speaking out, and more every single day. Al Gore has a whole whopping 26 to 52 UN "scientists" drafting the media reports for their climate change hoax. Those are the only reports you hear on the news, and many of the IPCC scientists don't agree at all with the UN reports. Some have even resigned over this. And now thanks to the Climategate Scandal, we know many of those UN scientists have been cooking the data.

OPEN LETTER TO ENVIRONMENTALISTS FROM WEATHER CHANNEL FOUNDER

CONGRESS TOLD THAT INCREASING CO2 WILL BE GOOD FOR ALL MANKIND
MORE SCIENTIFIC PEER-REVIEWED PAPERS...EDUCATE YOURSELF!

THE SCIENCE PROVES IT: CO2 HAS NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ON CLIMATE BUT PLENTY OF BENEFITS FOR EARTH!

STOP BIO-FUEL MADNESS and the WINDFARM FOLLY

WHY THE SCAM? HOW ABOUT TRILLIONS IN REVENUE? HELLO CARBON TAXES!

"This is not an issue of science but a moral issue of self serving
individuals imposing their ideology on the world under the guise of environmentalism and this has caused nothing but hardship for the entire world." -Norm Kalmanovitch, P.Geophys.

IT'S THE SUN, STUPID and GREENHOUSE THEORY DISPROVED

SCAM ROUNDUP:
GLOBAL SCAM - POLAR BEAR SCAM - MODELS SCAMglobal warming hysteria
KYOTO SCAM - GLOBAL NONSENSE
- MOVIE SCAM
GREEN SCAM - ANTARCTICA SCAM - P.I.K. SCAM
HURRICANE SCAM
global warming hysteria
WHAT ABOUT OUR SUN? and PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS GRAPH
and THESE FACTSglobal warming hysteria
- A CITIZEN’s PLEA
-
JUST COOL IT !
- STOP BLAMING CO2


AL GORE EXPOSED:
AL GORE: ALL GORE, ALL FAKE!

AL GORE STILL REFUSES TO DEBATE


Joseph Bast of www.globalwarmingheartland.org: On November 12, former vice president Al Gore announced he is joining a venture capital firm that seeks to cash in on global warming alarmism. Gore already has used global warming to become a very wealthy man, charging $200,000 and more to give speeches on global warming and steering investments to a firm he partly owns that sells worthless "carbon credits." MORE . . .
The Global Warming Myth Prof. Bellamy on why the Al Gore scenario is a scam - MUST READ
HOW THE ENVIRONMENTAL EXTREMISTS MANIPULATE THE MASSES: Last March, global warming fanatic Al Gore used a picture of two polar bears purportedly stranded on melting ice off the coast of Alaska as a visual aide to support his claim that man-made global warming is doing great harm to Mother Earth." MORE . . .
SHAME on GORE and A MOST PRESSING DISASTER - WHO WILL LISTEN?global warming hysteria

Mr Gore: Apology Accepted
and FYI, World is getting colder and Sunspots, not fossil fuels, agents of climate change, duh.

The UN agenda - World Domination: Globio and MDG Monitor and Agenda 21 - read and SHUDDER!

If you are still in any doubt about the totalitarian attitude of the UN's IPCC read this . . . AND WAKE UP!!

CARBON CAPTURE STUPIDITY and NO EVIDENCE FOR CO2 WARMING

109-page Submission to the NI Climate Change Committee:
www.tech-know.eu/NISubmission


CLICK FOR TEN GLOBAL WARMING TRUTHS


Click for over 400 more excellent myth-busting links


EXCELLENT EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE AT THESE LINKS.

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

TOP 15 CLIMATE MYTHS - COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE

COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE



MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate.


FACT: Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures. Average ground station readings do show a mild warming of 0.6 to 0.8C over the last 100 years, which is well within the natural variations recorded in the last millennium. However, the ground station network suffers from an uneven distribution across the globe; the stations are preferentially located in growing urban and industrial areas ("heat islands"), which show substantially higher readings than adjacent rural areas ("land use effects") i.e. local heat retention due to urban sprawl, not global warming…and it is these, 'false high' ground readings which are then programmed into the disreputable climate models used by your favourite enviro groups such as Greenpeace, which live up to the GIGO acronym — Garbage In, Garbage Out.

Looking at it from the long term, the planet has been gradually recovering from the Little Ice Age which ended in 1850. Our temps are in fact right where they should be. From a short term perspective, satellite measurements (which are far more accurate than land-based stations) are now showing a gradual decrease in global temperatures, and it is currently well accepted that temperatures have been slowly falling for over a decade now and cold records are being set far more often than warm records.

In summary, there has been no catastrophic warming recorded from either method whatsoever.


MYTH 2: It's never been warmer in the past.


FACT: We are in a relatively cool period and it used to be much warmer over countless periods in the past. Even just a few hundred years ago, the Vikings used to live in parts of Greenland without snow, and vineyards flourished in the North of London! There is nothing apocalyptic about warmer temperatures, in fact it's quite the opposite. In the UK, every mild winter saves 20,000 cold-related deaths, and scaled up over northern Europe mild winters save hundreds of thousands of lives each year. ALSO, data from ice core samples shows that in the past, temperatures have risen by ten times the current rise, and fallen again, in the space of a human lifetime. Nothing is happening "faster than normal" with today's weather/climate change/temperature variations, etc.

MYTH 3: The "hockey stick" graph proves that the earth has experienced a steady, very gradual temperature decrease for 1000 years, then recently began a sudden increase.


FACT: The hockey stick graph seen in An Inconvenient Truth and elsewhere has been completely debunked and proven fraudulent. It has airbrushed out the significant changes in climate which have continually occurred throughout geologic time. For instance, the Medieval Warm Period, from around 1000 to1200 AD (when the Vikings farmed on Greenland) was followed by a period known as the Little Ice Age. Since the end of the 17th Century the "average global temperature" has been rising at the low steady rate mentioned above; although from 1940 – 1970 temperatures actually dropped, leading to a Global Cooling scare. And now the temperatures are dropping once again, in fact they've been dropping since 1998.

The "hockey stick", a former poster boy of both the UN's IPCC and Canada's Environment Department, ignores historical recorded climatic swings, and is proven to be flawed and statistically unreliable as well. It has now been quietly removed from the IPCC reports and thoroughly discredited throughout the scientific world and is well regarded as one of the biggest scientific hoaxes of our time, yet you can still find it being used today by organizations such as the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, etc. The chart is a computer construct and a very faulty one at that. But what else would you expect, seeing as it was created only to help perpetrate the climate change lie.

Speaking of computer generated scams, let's not forget the drowning polar bears in Gore's movie and the fraudulent claim that the bears are disappearing. In fact they are actually thriving. Polar bear populations are 500% larger than they were 50 years ago. Shame on you, Al Gore, for playing on people's emotions to drive support for your enormous $45 trillion carbon tax hoax.

MYTH 4: Human produced carbon dioxide has increased over the last 100 years, adding to the Greenhouse effect, thus warming the earth.


FACT: Carbon dioxide levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout geologic time. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased. The RATE of growth during this period has also increased from about 0.2% per year to the present rate of about 0.4% per year,which growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years. However, there is no proof that CO2 is a measurable driver of global warming, let alone the tiny amount released by humankind. As measured in ice cores dated over many thousands of years, CO2 levels move up and down AFTER the temperature has done so, and thus are the RESULT OF, NOT THE CAUSE of warming.

Effectively, the man-made global warming theorists have put effect before cause — this completely debunks the entire global warming theory and shows that reducing carbon dioxide emissions is a futile King Canute exercise! Geological field work in recent sediments confirms this causal relationship. There is solid evidence that, as temperatures move up and down naturally and cyclically through solar radiation, orbital and galactic influences, the warming surface layers of the earth's oceans expel more CO2 as a result.

MYTH 5: CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas.


FACT: Greenhouse gases form about 3% of the atmosphere by volume. They consist of varying amounts, about 96.5% is water vapour and clouds, with the remainder being trace gases like CO2, CH4, Ozone and N2O. CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere. And then the human portion of that 0.037% is incredibly small.

But isn't CO2 the most important of the greenhouse gases? Nope. Not even close. Most of the greenhouse effect is due to water vapor, which is about 100 times as abundant in the atmosphere as CO2 and thus has a much larger effect.

In summary, water vapour is by far the most important and overwhelming greenhouse gas. Those attributing climate change to CO2 rarely mention these important facts.

What's next? A steam tax when you boil a kettle for your cup of tea?

MYTH 6: Computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming.


FACT: The computer models assume that CO2 is the primary climate driver, when in fact CO2 does not drive climate, and they do not take into account the Sun, which has the most significant effect on climate. You cannot use the output of a model to verify or prove its initial assumption - that is circular reasoning and is illogical. Computer models can be made to roughly match the 20th century temperature rise by adjusting many input parameters and using strong positive feedbacks. They do not "prove" anything. Also, computer models predicting global warming are incapable of properly including the effects of the sun, cosmic rays and the clouds. The sun is a major cause of temperature variation on the earth surface as its received radiation changes all the time, This happens largely in cyclical fashion. The number and the lengths in time of sunspots can be correlated very closely with average temperatures on earth, e.g. the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period. Varying intensity of solar heat radiation affects the surface temperature of the oceans and the currents. Warmer ocean water expels gases, some of which are CO2. Solar radiation interferes with the cosmic ray flux, thus influencing the amount ionized nuclei which control cloud cover. Again, models are in essence: GARBAGE IN = GARBAGE OUT. (Maybe they should also take note that when the Earth warms, so do other planets in our solar system. Now please explain how CO2 can cause that?!)

MYTH 7: The UN proved that man–made CO2 causes global warming.


FACT: In a 1996 report by the UN on global warming, two statements were deleted from the final draft. Here they are:
1) “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases.”
2) “No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to man–made causes”


Scientists draft reports for the IPCC, but the IPCC are bureaucrats appointed by governments, in fact many scientists who contribute to the reports disagree with the ’spin’ that the IPCC and media put on their findings. The latest report suggests that the next 100 years might see a temperature change of 6 Celsius yet a Lead Author for the IPCC (Dr John Christy UAH/NASA) has pointed out that the scenarios with the fastest warming rates were added to the report at a late stage, at the request of a few governments (to create urgency) — in other words the scientists were told what to do by politicians and many of them strongly disagree. This is not science. It's political propaganda.
To the present day there is still no scientific proof that man-made CO2 has any effect on global warming or can cause "climate change". However, there is plenty of scientific proof that the Earth has been cooling while CO2 has risen, and that increased CO2 is very beneficial to our planet.

MYTH 8: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a pollutant.


FACT: This is absolutely not true. Nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere. We could not live in 100% nitrogen either. Carbon dioxide is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is. CO2 is essential to life on earth. It is necessary for plant growth since increased CO2 intake as a result of increased atmospheric concentration causes many trees and other plants to grow more vigorously. Unfortunately, the Canadian Government has included CO2 with a number of truly toxic and noxious substances listed by the Environmental Protection Act, only as their means to politically control it. In the US, president Obama is also trying to classify CO2 as a "pollutant" for the same political reasons. It's really quite terrifying and is a slap in the face to science.

MYTH 9: Reducing car use will cut carbon dioxide levels and save the planet!


FACT: The planet does not need saving from this mythical problem of CO2 emissions from cars, but taking this on anyway, removing every car from every road in every country overnight would NOT produce any change in the carbon dioxide level of the atmosphere, and in any case it is pointless trying to alter climate by changing carbon dioxide levels as the cause and effect is the other way round! — It is changes in the activity of the Sun that cause temperature changes on earth, with any temperature rise causing carbon dioxide to de-gas from the oceans.

MYTH 10: Global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes.


FACT: There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that supports such claims on a global scale. Regional variations may occur, and always do. Growing insurance and infrastructure repair costs, particularly in coastal areas, are sometimes claimed to be the result of increasing frequency and severity of storms, whereas in reality they are a function of increasing population density, escalating development value, and ever more media reporting. Weather records clearly show there has been a decrease in violent and extreme weather over the past century.

Extreme weather correlates with the cycle of solar activity, not carbon dioxide emissions or political elections. The recent heavy rainfall in winter and spring is a perfect example of this — it occurred at solar maximum at a time when solar maxima are very intense — this pattern may well repeat every 11 years until about 2045. Furthermore, the hottest and coldest days on record occurred more than 60 years ago (before industry) and the wackiest most extreme weather recorded over the last 100 years, including the strongest hurricanes, and devastating droughts/floods, all occurred in the 1940's. And guess what? They will always happen, every year, with new records set daily. Normal.

Contrary to media hysteria claiming increasing storm severities, scientists have studied this issue and come to the opposite conclusion: extreme events are becoming LESS common. Atlantic hurricanes were much more numerous from 1950 to 1975 than from 1975 to present. Hailstorms in the US are 35% less common than they were fifty years ago. Extreme rainfall in the US at the end of the 20th century is comparable to what it was at the beginning of the 20th century. Also, there is much empirical evidence to suggest that when global warming does happen from time to time, more warmth generally leads to a more stable climate with less weather extremes. Once again, the greenies got it backwards.

MYTH 11: Carbon taxes, petrol duty, and workplace parking charges are justifiable environmental taxes.


FACT: As carbon dioxide emissions from cars and factories does not have any impact on climate, these taxes are 'just another tax' on enterprise and mobility, and have no real green credentials. None.

MYTH 12: Global warming must be real since governments are trying to cover it up and I see protests all the time!

FACT: It's exactly the opposite. Governments everywhere are not only active supporters of the climate change lie, they are promoters of it and massively fund it. And they've done an absolutely brilliant job of it by easily convincing the world's alarmists and Earth-conscientious citizens of an impending catastrophe, thereby utilizing the protesters and subsequent immense political pressure to push through the very policies they aspire to implement on all of us. Governments have learned the power of activism ever since the days of the revolution, and they've managed to use it to their advantage. Extremist environmentalists have been duped into becoming a tool for the very governments they believe they're "fighting" against. A recent example of this was the declaration by Al Gore and James Hansen which encouraged activists to consider civil disobedience to stop the construction of new coal power plants.

In defense of many environmentalists and "cause-jumpers", quite often they simply do not know any better but are actually well intentioned.

MYTH 13: Receding glaciers, the calving of ice shelves, and the shrinking of snow on Mt. Kilimanjaro are proof of global warming.


FACT: Glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for hundreds of years. Recent glacier melting is a consequence of coming out of the very cool period of the Little Ice Age. Ice shelves have been breaking off for centuries. Scientists know of at least 33 periods of glaciers growing and then retreating. It’s normal. Besides, glacier's health is dependent as much on precipitation as on temperature. What you see on your television newscasts are images of the annual summer melt off, which happens every single year and is nothing to worry about.

Global warming is not melting Mt. Kilimanjaro's alpine glacier. Temperatures at Mt. Kilimanjaro have been slightly cooling since at least the middle of the twentieth century, and those temperatures virtually never rise above freezing. Scientists have long known that deforestation at the base of the mountain is causing the mountaintop glacier to shrink, by reducing the moisture and resultant precipitation in mountain updrafts.

MYTH 14: The earth’s poles are warming; polar ice caps are breaking up and melting and the sea level rising.



FACT: The earth is variable. The western Arctic may be gotten somewhat warmer last century, due to unrelated cyclic events in the Pacific Ocean, but the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder. And now the western Arctic is cooling again. The small Palmer Peninsula of Antarctica is getting warmer, while the main Antarctic continent is actually cooling. Ice thicknesses are increasing both on Greenland and in Antarctica.
Sea level monitoring in the Pacific (Tuvalu) and Indian Oceans (Maldives) has shown no sign of any sea level rise.

MYTH 15: There are only a tiny handful of maverick scientists who dispute that man-made global warming theory is true.

FACT: There are literally tens of thousands of signatures from scientists worldwide on many petitions, ranging from the Oregon Petition Project, the Manhattan Declaration, all the way to the Leipzig Declaration which all state that there is no evidence for the man-made global warming theory nor is there any impact from mankind’s activities on climate. Many scientists are now dissenting against Al Gore and the IPCC and strongly believe that the Kyoto agreement is a total waste of time, expensive, dangerous and one of the biggest political scams ever perpetrated on the public … as H L Mencken said "The fundamental aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed, and hence clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary" … the desire to save the world usually fronts a desire to rule it. Of the scientists who support the climate change theory, many are on payrolls of government agencies and others are simply securing their funding. The consensus is clear: Man-made climate change is a hoax.

THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT
Over 95 percent of the Greenhouse Effect is the result of atmospheric water vapor in Earth's atmosphere. But because water droplets held in suspension (clouds) make almost as good a reflector as they do a thermal insulator, there is little rise in daytime temperatures due to the Greenhouse Effect.
Any greenhouse warming, if it does occur, is limited to primarily increasing nighttime temperatures, which provides beneficial moderation of nighttime low temperatures, but no increase in daytime high temperatures.

Did you know...
Although the biggest source of greenhouse gas is our oceans, the world's natural wetlands also produce more greenhouse gas contributions annually than all human sources combined. Furthermore, Animals and volcanoes produce so much CO2 that it completely dwarfs mankinds insignificantly tiny emissions.
To summarize what we have learned so far:
  • Climate changes are not driven by CO2.
  • Air pollution has nothing to do with CO2.
  • Human-produced CO2 is a miniscule fraction of a percentage of greenhouse gases.
  • 96.5% of all greenhouse gases emit from the oceans, naturally.
  • The small amount of CO2 produced by humans is wholly beneficial to the planet.
  • Without CO2, vegetation dies, herbivores die, you die.
  • CO2 levels used to be much higher many times in the past.
  • Higher temperatures from the sun result in CO2 levels rising long afterwards.
  • Rising CO2 is an effect of global warming, not a cause.
  • Global warming and cooling is a purely natural phenomenon.
  • The higher the CO2 levels in the atmosphere, the greener our planet becomes.
  • Forests and plant life growth has increased by approx 40% over the last 50 years, thanks to CO2.
  • Increasing CO2 yields larger food crops. This is beneficial to a growing population.
  • The Earth is not currently warming, it is in fact cooling.
  • Temperatures in the past have often been much warmer than today.
  • Even if it were to happen, a warmer Earth is far better than a colder one, for all life.
  • Many scientists believe we are on the cuss of the next little ice age.
  • When the planet warms and cools it is due to the sun. Not your car.
  • Polar ice is now at record levels and still growing.
  • Climate changes happen all the time, and have occurred much faster than anything in modern times.
  • There has been no increase in extreme weather. In fact, records show the exact opposite.
So don't panic. You're NOT at fault!

“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S. Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.


Former President Clinton, Al Gore, Obama and others have often cited a letter signed by 2600 scientists that global warming will have catastrophic effects on humanity. Thanks to Citizens for a Sound Economy, we know now that fewer than 10 percent of these "scientists" know anything about climate. Among the signers: a plastic surgeon, two landscape architects, a hotel administrator, a gynecologist, seven sociologists, a linguist, and a practitioner of traditional Chinese medicine. We also now know that many of the few actual scientists on that panel are not asked whether they agree with the UN's asessments, and many of them vehemently disagree and have thus asked to have their names removed from that fraudulent list. Global Warming Treaty is All Pain, No Gain --- Malcom Wallop

"When a bureaucracy's reason for existence is threatened, it typically generates new missions." Desperately Seeking Mission: Why the State Department's Gone Green --- Peter VanDoren
With the release of Al Gore's propaganda movie An Inconvenient Truth and with the help of the media the public has been driven into a mass hysteria based not on science but lies. The movie has been completely debunked and the junk science used by extremists is exactly that: junk.

You will learn that there is no empirical evidence that man-made CO2 is a cause of temperature increases. It is, in fact, an after effect of temperature increases. Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant, pollution has nothing to do with global warming, politicians who support such absurd notions are a fraud, there is no "consensus" on global warming, the Earth has been far warmer in the past than it is today, polar bears are not endangered or dying, they are thriving, droughts and hurricanes are not caused or made worse by global warming, extreme weather events are decreasing, and there is extensive evidence of the factual natural causes of global warming when it really happens from time to time, pointing squarely at increased solar activity and orbital variations.

Those who claim that skeptics are in bed with the oil companies or receive funding from questionable sources need to give their heads a shake and look at the facts. Funding and grants to PROMOTE the climate change myth are astronomical, while money for the skeptics is pocket change:

Debunkers of the global warming theory have received approx = $21M (Million).
Supporters of the global warming theory have received approx = $79B (BILLION!)

Many people want a piece of that $79 billion pie, and the figure will only get higher so long as these groups can continue to convince the populous that the end is near unless we all start paying to emit that evil CO2! Don't you find it odd that nearly nobody ever accuses the giant Enviro groups of being in bed with the large Green Industry? Or that Al Gore has boatloads of his own cash on the line in these companies? Every environmental, political, and research group knows full well that in order to receive funding and grants they need to create urgency and panic. Money then flows in like a river, regardless of actual science. It's a sad fact.


It is better to trust scientists than politicans. Do not let fear ruin your day. Learn the Facts.

There are several motives for the media and politicians to lie to you about global warming, aside from money and control.

~The media sells more papers, magazines, and television ratings soar when their audience is scared of some imminent catastrophe that your respective service is reporting on. Although, they can't decide whether we're going to burn to death, freeze to death, or drown. http://epw.senate.gov/speechitem.cfm?party=rep&id=263759

~Environmental organizations and some scientists will lie to you because their funding depends on it. If theres no crisis to work through, then they start losing funding. This is well documented.
http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/von_Storch/staged_angst/a_climate_of_staged_angst.html

~Foreign countries are lying to us (by means of the IPCC) because they wish to throw a monkey wrench into the inner workings of western economies, which are the strongest in the world. If our economy slows down, the economic standing of other countries improves because we will no longer dominate the markets.

~Development and industrialization of third world countries will be stamped out, along with hundreds of millions of lives, all under the guise of "saving the planet from climate change". It's absolutely sickening. So, who's really on the "immoral" side? Us or the alarmists?

~Wanna talk about new taxes and restricted freedoms? Try carbon taxes on everything and strict regulations for everyone....all coming soon by convincing you that CO2 & greenhouse gases are somehow evil and you must pay to emit them. Too bad they can't tax the oceans since they are the cause of 96.5% of all greenhouse emissions, naturally, eh! Also too bad they can't go back in time and tax the dinosaurs since CO2 levels were MUCH higher back then and it must have been their fault.

The motives for deception are there. Do your part to fight alarmism!

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

PROTEST RALLY OUTSIDE ALP'S NATIONAL CONFERENCE















PROTEST RALLY OUTSIDE ALP'S NATIONAL CONFERENCE

DARLING HARBOUR CONVENTION CENTRE

SUNDAY DECEMBER 4TH 12NOON, BAYSIDE CENTRE

"THE PM WHO CONNED US WITH A LIE"


PM GILLARD WHY?

CARBON TAX - LIE

MINING TAX - LIE

ASSYLUM POLICY - LIE

NBN - LIE


Picture_6


Hi everyone,

This is certainly a testing time in our ongoing campaign against the introduction of the carbon tax. We can feel recharged by this week's newspoll with Labor's primary vote back down to 30% & the two party preferred at 57% Coalition to Labor's 43%. This is truly incredible when one considers the blaze of media attention the PM has received with world leaders in the Queen, President Obama, CHOGM, G20 and the recent Asian leaders forum. In contrast Tony Abbott tactfully kept a low key approach knowing full well he could not compete against those big 5 tickets. Now we get down to the real agenda, not the fairytale, fake message that the PM tried to portray to world leaders and the media.

This PM cannot escape the fact that she conned the nation with a lie that is "there will be no carbon tax..." and the other areas mentioned above. Our next protest rally outside the ALP national conference will be a big reminder to all those in attendance and the media of this huge lie that will not go away until the next election, hopefully very soon.

CATA encourages all to be there and make it known to everyone that we will not be beaten, this tax must be and will be repealed. This ALP event is over 3 days from Friday 2nd to Sunday 4th. We will meet outside the Bayside Centre at 12noon on Sunday the 4th of December. Bring your banners, your loud voices as we let the media and those inside the conference know exactly how we feel in been conned by the PM over the carbon tax.

This protest will be the start of a new form of campaigning until this tax is repealed. We need to be in their face and on their turf. This carbon tax cannot stand the test of time as it is a big fraud, con and will do ZERO for the climate.

So we have every reason to continue our attack until the job is done, we have a promise signed in blood from Tony Abbott that he will repeal it, for that reason CATA will be behind the Coalition actions in axing the tax.


Kind regards


CATA TEAM
Consumers & Taxpayers Association Inc.

MORE INFO HERE : http://www.consumersandtaxpayersassociation.com/events_6.html

Canada adds its objections to $100-billion climate fund

The Harper government is joining the United States in raising objections to a planned $100-billion (U.S.) a year climate fund that is designed to bridge differences between rich countries and the developing world.
Heading into the United Nations climate conference in Durban this week, the United States has made it clear it will not support the current proposals for the climate fund over concerns about how the money would be raised, lack of verification of how it is spent, and an unwillingness of major emerging countries to commit to legally binding emissions reduction.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/video/video-kyoto-is-in-the-past-environment-minister-says/article2252304/?from=2252782

Environment Minister Peter Kent has raised his own doubts about the climate fund, saying on the weekend that Ottawa would not agree to proceeding with it in the absence of a broad global agreement, which would include China and other emerging economies, to restrain greenhouse-gas emissions.
The Harper government has already indicated it will not commit to new targets under the Kyoto Protocol after the treaty’s first commitment period expires in 2012.
Mr. Kent on Monday would not comment directly on reports that the government will pull out of Kyoto after the Durban conference. Such a move would remove international monitoring of Canada’s emissions reductions. It would also amount to a repudiation of key principles of the Kyoto treaty, notably that the developed world has a historical obligation to do the lion’s share of reduction because it has contributed most of the industrial emissions that cause climate change.
“Kyoto is the past,” he told reporters on Monday.
The Harper government has instead endorsed the 2009 Copenhagen accord, which included a commitment to reduce greenhouse gases from all major emitting countries, including the United States and China. While countries have published targets, negotiators have made little progress in converting the Copenhagen political compromise into a binding treaty.
“Our commitment is to Copenhagen and to a realistic plan to reduce greenhouse gases in alignment with our neighbour and closest trading partner with whom we have very integrated economies to reduce our greenhouse gases on a continental basis,” Mr. Kent said.
New Democratic Party environment critic Megan Leslie accused the government of attempting to sabotage the Durban talks with its hard line on Kyoto.
The Harper government has largely mirrored the U.S. approach to global climate negotiations, a stand that has frustrated European and developing countries that are members of the Kyoto Protocol.
Negotiators at Durban are wrestling with how to finance the climate fund. UN officials are suggesting countries consider taxes on air travel and marine transport, and some countries support a financial transaction tax. Neither Washington nor Ottawa have supported such measures.
The United States last week indicated it supported the “basic concept” of a climate fund, but had serious reservations about its design. Washington wants major emerging countries like China, Brazil and India to play a role in financing emission reductions in lesser developed countries.
Graham Saul, executive director of Climate Action Network Canada, said the climate fund is a critical prerequisite to an international treaty that would bring real progress on global emissions reductions.
“The fund was supposed to be about building trust toward a meaningful international agreement and Canada has violated that trust in so many ways, this is only the latest way,” Mr. Saul said.

Climategate scientists DID collude with government officials to hide research that didn't fit their apocalyptic global warming

Former Chancellor Nigel Lawson was strongly critical of those who supported the 'Climategate' scientists
Former Chancellor Nigel Lawson
was strongly critical of those who
supported the 'Climategate' scientists
  • 5,000 leaked emails reveal scientists deleted evidence that cast doubt on claims climate change was man-made
  • Experts were under orders from US and UK officials to come up with a 'strong message'
  • Critics claim: 'The stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering'
  • Scientist asks, 'What if they find that climate change is a natural fluctuation? They'll kill us all'

  • more than 5,000 documents have been leaked online purporting to be the  correspondence of climate scientists at the University of East Anglia who were previously accused of ‘massaging’ evidence of man-made climate change.

    Following on from the original 'climategate' emails of 2009, the new package appears to show systematic suppression of evidence, and even publication of reports that scientists knew to to be based on flawed approaches.

    And not only do the emails paint a picture of scientists manipulating data, government employees at the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) are also implicated.

    One message appeared to show a member of Defra staff telling colleagues working on climate science to give the government a ‘strong message’.

    The emails paint a clear picture of scientists selectively using data, and colluding with politicians to misuse scientific information.

    ‘Humphrey’, said to work at Defra, writes: ‘I cannot overstate the HUGE amount of political interest in the project as a message that the government can give on climate change to help them tell their story.

    'They want their story to be a very strong one and don’t want to be made to look foolish.’

    Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climatic Research Unit at the centre of the affair, said the group findings did stand up to scrutiny.

    Yet one of the newly released emails, written by Prof. Jones - who is working with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - said: 'Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden.

    'I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.'

    The University of East Anglia, where most of the emails originated - none of the newly released emails appear to be post 2009, but clarify the extent of government involvement in the scandal

    The University of East Anglia, where most of the emails originated - none of the newly released emails appear to be post 2009, but clarify the extent of government involvement in the scandal

    In another of his emails, he wrote: 'I’ve been told that Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is above national Freedom of Information Acts.

    'One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process.'





    Other scientists are clearly against such a policy, but some seemed happy to collude with concealing and destroying evidence.

    One nervous scientist wrote: 'The figure you sent is very deceptive.'


    'I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run,' wrote another.

    The lead author of one of the reports, Jonathan Overpeck, wrote, 'The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guide what’s included and what is left out.'

    A weak performance by Environment Secretary Chris Huhne on Question Time has helped to inflame the row over the second leak of private UEA emails - now described as Climategate 2.0.

    Professor Phil Jones, Director of the Climatic Research Unit, appears before the Science and Technology Committee after the last dump of leaked climate-change emails
    Professor Phil Jones, Director of the Climatic Research Unit, appears before the Science and Technology Committee after the last dump of leaked climate-change emails

    Former Chancellor Nigel Lawson's Global Warming Policy Foundation warned against ignoring 'shortcomings' in a letter strongly critical of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    It said: 'The BBC, in determining its policy towards the coverage of global warming, which is of course not simply a scientific issue but an economic and a political issue, too, ought to shred that section of the Jones review and revert to the impartiality laid down in its charter.'

    He was also strongly critical of sections of the media who lent support to the scientists.


    Andrew Orlwowski, UK science site The Register's science correspondent comments on one email that says, 'What if climate change turns out to be a natural fluctuation? They'll kill us all'

    'The stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering.'

    Orlowski says, 'That won't be necessary.'

    Clive Crook, a commentator for the Atlantic, who described the earlier inquiries into the Climategate emails as 'ineffectual' and 'mealy mouthed', reportedly said, 'The closed-mindedness of these supposed men of science, their willingness to go to any lengths to defend a preconceived message, is surprising even to me.

    'The stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering.'



    There is other correspondence from scientists such as Prof Michael Mann, director of the Earth System Science Centre at Penn State University, some of which have a distinct feel of PR 'spin'.

    The release of the information echoes the 'Climategate' leaks of hacked private emails two years ago ahead of crunch climate talks in Copenhagen that referred to ways to ‘hide the decline’ in global warming.

    A series of independent reviews cleared the East Anglia researchers of impropriety, but they were told they had been too secretive.

    Today's leak may also be timed to disrupt the next session of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change next week in South Africa.
    The new email leak is accompanied by a text file which appears to protest against the huge expense of anti-warming technologies - highlighting deaths from poverty against the $36 billion expense of 'green' energy
    The new email leak is accompanied by a text file which appears to protest against the huge expense of anti-warming technologies - highlighting deaths from poverty against the $36 billion expense of 'green' energy

    The emails have been released in the form of quotes carefully 'chosen' to show bias, or that scientists were pursuing a particular agenda in their research.


    The unnamed individuals who released them chose the 5,000 emails from keyword searches, saying, 'We could not read every one, but tried to cover the most relevant topics.'

    The emails were posted on a Russian server - Sinwt.ru - as a downloadable ZIP file in an apparent attempt to cause disruption in advance of next week's climate change conference in Durban.

    They were rapidly reposted on climate-sceptic blogs such as The Air Vent.

    It is not clear, though, whether they are new, or indeed whether they indicate any kind of conspiracy.

    The release of the data was accompanied by a 'press release' in the form of a readme file, which said, 'Over 2.5 billion people live on less than $2 a day.'

    'Poverty is a death sentence. Nations must invest $37 trillion in energy technologies by 2030 to stabilise greenhouse gas emissions at sustainable levels.'

    'Today's decisions should be based on all the information we can get, not on hiding the decline,' said the file.

    The identity of the people who posted it was not revealed - although the clear political statement is new.

    The file also contains more than 200,000 other emails, which are encrypted, and no password is provided.

    Presumably, this is to protect the individuals involved - or simply because the material is so non-controversial or boring that it's not worth releasing.



    NASA thermal satellite image showing the world's arctic surface temperature trends: Today's emails appear to show scientists interested in painting a particular picture of such trends - but the information is not new
    NASA thermal satellite image showing the world's arctic surface temperature trends: Today's emails appear to show scientists interested in painting a particular picture of such trends - but the information is not new

    The University of East Anglia has not confirmed whether the material is genuine.

    None of the material appears to be new, either: it seems to date from the first release in 2009.

    It also occurs against a rather different scientific background, after the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature review of climate-science data by prominent climate sceptic Richard Muller, which analysed 1.6 billion temperature records, and concluded that global warming was a genuine effect.

    It is still unclear what effect - or combination of effects - is causing the current warming of the atmosphere, which has risen around one temperature in the past 50 years.

    Professor Mann, speaking to the Guardian, described the release as 'truly pathetic.'

    'Well, they look like mine but I hardly see anything that appears damning at all, despite them having been taken out of context.

    'I guess they had very little left to work with, having culled in the first round the emails that could most easily be taken out of context to try to make me look bad.'

    A police investigation is ongoing.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2066240/Second-leak-climate-emails-Political-giants-weigh-bias-scientists-bowing-financial-pressure-sponsors.html#ixzz1f4QA2Yid

    Saturday, November 5, 2011

    NO CARBON TAX RALLY Thursday 17th November 2011 at 12 Midday

    http://www.stopcarbonlies.com/canberra_rally.html
     
    Rally Info


    NO CARBON TAX RALLY
    REPEAL CARBON TAX - YES WE CAN
    PRESIDENT OBAMA WILL ADDRESS PARLIAMENT
    Thursday 17th November 2011 at 12 Midday
    Parliament House, Canberra

    Join Young Australians, Working Families, Students, Workers, Small Business Owners and Senior Citizens who will take the Election Now, No Carbon Tax message up with the Government by protesting outside Parliament House in Canberra during the visit of the USA President Obama.

    DateThursday 17th November 2011
    Time
    1200 Midday
    WhereParliament House, Canberra

    TransportCoaches organised by CATA
    Public Transport
    Own Transport



    Schedule

    • March
    • MC Welcome
    • Key Note Speaker
    • Invited Speakers
    • Industry Speakers
    • Rally Participants
    • MC Close

    ParkingTBA


    What to bring
    • Sunscreen,
    • hat,
    • water bottle,
    • placard,
    • casual or more formal attire is fine.
    • Aussie Flags are another great symbol.
    • Wet weather gear, but only if forecast looks like rain.
    Placards and Props**
    Placards should be soft materials like cardboard or corflute and should not be attached to large stakes or poles. You cannot put anything into the ground on the lawn, gardens and walkways as required by the authority. No structures are permitted. If in doubt please contact CATA for clarification.

    Aussie SpiritLastly, bring your Aussie spirit, integrity and pride. Its an uplifting experience and you will meet a lot of people as we put the Government on notice that Australians take democracy seriously and expect their representatives to act with integrity and seek a mandate for major issues.